Donald Trump for President?? Why Not?

Trump Bankrupt

August 14, 2015
Istanbul, Turkey


Just a few weeks ago, US talk show host Stephen Colbert was asked if he thought that Donald Trump had a chance of becoming President of the United States.

Colbert responded sincerely. “Honestly, he could. And that’s not an opinion of Trump. That’s my opinion of our nation.”

He’s right. The Land of the Free may very well be ready for something completely different. And Trump certainly seems able to deliver.

He is, after all, unique in his field. Donald Trump has never served in politics, and his blunt style is almost the exact opposite of every other major candidate.

But there’s one thing that really sets him apart, that, in my opinion, makes him the most qualified person for the job:

Donald Trump is an expert at declaring bankruptcy.

When the going gets tough, Trump stiffs his creditors. He’s done it four times!

Candidly, this is precisely what the Land of the Free needs right now: someone who can stop beating around the bush and just get on with it already.

As history shows, a default is inevitable.

The calculus is quite simple: when governments take on too much debt, they start having to divert a huge amount of their tax revenue just to pay interest.

This means that, at a minimum, the government has to sacrifice many of the promises they made to their citizens. They cut other programs in order to have enough money to pay interest.

But that’s not too popular. So instead they typically just borrow more money… until they’re borrowing money just to pay interest on money they’ve already borrowed.

This makes the problem exponentially worse.

Debt skyrockets. And soon the government is spending more on interest payments than national defense. (The US is almost at this point).

Eventually a bankrupt government has no choice: either default on their bondholders, or default on the obligations they made to their citizens. Or both.

This could take the form of a ‘selective default’. For example, the US government could default on the $2.4 trillion that it owes the Federal Reserve.

Or the $1.2 trillion that it owes China.

These are both possibilities.

But the prospect of default on “risk free” US government bonds would throw the global financial system into a tailspin; not to mention it would be the final nail in the coffin for the US dollar’s dominant reserve status.

Fortunately there are easier options for Uncle Sam.

The biggest debts that are owed by the US government are the obligations they owe to you.

Specifically, all the benefits like Social Security and Medicare they promised to American taxpayers.

The US government’s own numbers estimate these obligations at nearly $42 TRILLION, completely dwarfing what they owe China, or anyone else.

Then there’s the obligation they have to preserve the purchasing power of the $12 trillion held by the American people.

That’s the current value of the money supply in the United States right now.

History shows that debasing a nation’s currency is one of the easiest and most effective ways for bankrupt governments to plunder their citizens’ wealth, little by little over time.

As I explain in today’s podcast, the hard reality that most people don’t seem to get is that the US government is bankrupt.

This isn’t some wild assertion or conspiracy theory; their own financial statements show that the government’s ‘net worth’ is NEGATIVE $17.7 trillion.

And yes, the US is already borrowing money just to pay interest.

In fact the combined expenses of interest on the debt plus mandatory entitlements like Social Security nearly exceed their entire tax revenue.

In other words, you could eliminate nearly everything we think of as government– the EPA, the IRS, Homeland Security, etc. and it wouldn’t make a dent in the national debt.

When things get this dire, it doesn’t matter who sits in the chair.

You might as well elect a chimpanzee in the hopes that Mister Bubbles might accelerate the decline.

Donald Trump may very well be that chimpanzee. Especially given his unparalleled experience in declaring bankruptcy.

Nations that pass the economic point of no return can’t rebuild until they hit rock bottom.

And the US is way past that point. So let’s get on with it already and hit the reset button.

Join me for more in today’s podcast as I break down the details of the US government’s $60 trillion in liabilities– and what you can do about it.

Enjoy your weekend,
Simon Black

Immigration Threat is Real

I suppose at my age of 73 the immigration thing may, and I do mean may not be a threat, however the younger generation is in for some real problems if this isn’t stopped.  Keep in mind our government is allowing more Muslims in than ever before and this just since obama has been a supposedly leader.



By Frosty Wooldridge
August 14, 2015

Immigration Chart

Part 1: Islam’s cultural threat

This interview series stems from the imminent historian from Yale University, Mr. Bromwell Ault.You may contact him at here.

As an octogenarian, Ault observed this country’s rise through the 20th century and quickening decline in the 21st century. He lends a keen eye and articulate mind to what our civilization faces.

Our civilization changed radically because of the late U.S. Senator Teddy Kennedy’s “1965 Immigration Reform Act”, which dramatically shifted thedemographic and ethnic configuration of America. It changed from 90 percent European-American, 7 percent African-American and 3 percent Hispanic-American—-to a polyglot society with ethnic groups from 180 different countries. European-Americans face becoming the newest minority by 2042, when Hispanic-Mexican Americans become the new majority.

America split its ethos, culture and language into fragmented parts, and the most pressing of those fragments finds itself in the rise of the most violent religion in the world: Islam.

Ault said, “Islam’s potential threat to our American and western culture and is one of the most important topics that we have undertaken. We will explore other cultural contradictions in America that contribute to understanding and answering our title questions.

“Before engaging the argument of Islam’s place in America and, by extension, in WCIV (western civilization) there is one essential, but rarely recognized, aspect of culture that should be made clear. Cultures can be, and have been, changed by individual efforts or actions; and by relatively small groups when a few individuals combine their forces.

“Ours is an age of technology ascendant in which basic forms of reporting news and opinion such as local newspapers, magazine and radio stations have been bought, combined and transformed into our mainstream media (MSM) complex to market an array of services or products capable of generating large and ongoing revenues. No longer dominated by their original attitudes and entities, they now comprise the personal, social, political and economic directions that guide our culture.

“In view of this existential transformation of our public media by technology and the combination of its ownership, it is important to restate that cultures (even ours) can be changed by individual efforts/actions. No two cultures are the same and all cultures, regardless of similar or identical origins, locations, or histories, show significant differences. And, while we generally think of cultures in terms of a mass rather than an individual scale, we have altered them more often and more significantly than we allow ourselves to admit.

“History offers some interesting examples such as the three extraordinary cultural shifts that occurred in Europe in the hundred years from 1450 to 1550. The first was Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press and moveable type in 1456; the next was Martin Luther’s posting of his theses to reform the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) in 1517; and last was the Act of Supremacy passed in the English parliament in 1534 which was pushed by Henry VIII and established him and successive English monarchs as titular heads of an Anglican Church separate from all its former Roman connections, and with its ecclesiastic authority lodged in the Archbishop of Canterbury.

“Within the cultural blink of an eye these three men drastically changed human communication, Europe’s educational and religious structure and the way that commoners and monarchs were to live for the next two and a half centuries. Gutenberg could not foresee in detail all the changes that his printing press technology would deliver, but he certainly envisioned that its superiority over the methods of book production then available would create a wide demand for it.

“Similarly, Luther’s criticisms of the RCC’s role as the sole religious force in Europe were mostly aimed at the unethical conduct and corruption which had attached themselves to both the spirit and the structure of Christianity, as it struggled to survive and adapt to the realities of life in Europe in the centuries that followed the fall of the Roman Empire. While Luther’s message seems primarily correctional, he was willing to separate himself from the errors and excesses of early 16th century Roman religious practice. Whether he envisioned the deep schism and wide growth of the Reformation brought on by his objections is much less certain.”

Today, we face Islam, a violent change-agent being impregnated into America at breakneck speed. Within 25 years, Islam’s oil-rich countries built 2,200 mosques, also known as “territorial markers” across the USA, a predominate Christian nation. Our country already experiences many tenants of Islam: female genital mutilation of women, burkas worn by women, arranged marriages, multiple wives, honor killings, beheadings and behandings and gay bashing.

Additionally, we see rising anger of African-Americans and the silent birth-rate take-over by Mexican-Americans. Each group enclaves into separate and distinct cultural groupings with their own languages and world view. In Detroit, Michigan Islam dominates faster than anyone appreciates.

Part 2: The onslaught of cultural chaos, Islam, Koran and its prime directive—“Convert or kill all non-believers.”

Definition of slogan: “Immigration Shutdown Now means the American people want all legal immigration dropped to less than 10,000 annually with compatible immigrants that fit our ethos and want to become Americans, and only those who benefit our country and/or they marry an American and speak English. That means we want all illegal immigration stopped by arresting, prosecuting and jailing employers of illegal aliens. We deport all illegal aliens by taking their jobs away and as we catch them. We want English mandated as our national language. We demand a cessation of Muslim immigration in order to protect our culture, language and way of life. We can’t save the world but we can destroy our civilization. We demand a stable population that allows everyone to live, work and thrive into the 21st century. Especially our children.” FHW

That’s why you need to take action. Send this series to everyone in your network. Educate them. Urge them to take action by joining these websites to become faxers of prewritten letters and phone callers. We must force Congress into an “Immigration Shutdown Now!


Unity in Scripture

Although one can derive inspiration from any portion of the Scripture, it is better to have an understanding of the general structure of the Bible to get the most out of it. The Old Testament is an account of a nation, Israel. Out of that nation came Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world. The New Testament is an account of a Man, the Son of man, the Savior. God Himself became a man, so that we might know what He is like. His appearance on the earth was the central, most important event of history. The Old Testament gives the background for this event; the New Testament tells the story of its fulfillment. You will find a unity of thought and purpose which indicates that one mind inspired the writing of the whole.



autism vaccinesFrom the desk of Jenny Thompson on Polio

You’ve read the stories. Maybe you’ve seen the terrible pictures.

American children were perfectly healthy one day, and paralyzed the next. Many were placed on ventilators to save their lives.

It’s been months since a mysterious virus struck more than 1,100 children across America — and many of the kids still aren’t better. They use crutches and walkers to stand. They’ve lost the use of their arms and hands.

Parents say they’re being kept in the dark. The CDC claims its hunting for answers.

But these children aren’t victims of some terrible new disease. They’re just the latest casualties of what might be the greatest cover-up in medical history.

It’s all in the name

The CDC declared the U.S. “polio free” in 1979. But the story that polio is gone, vanished by a wonder vaccine, is just that — a story.

Because polio — or at least what we all used to agree was polio — is still very much with us. And I’m not talking about in Third World countries, but right here in places like Colorado, Connecticut and New York.

Right now, there are well over 100 (the true number is unknown) paralyzed children in the U.S., struck down by what’s now being called EV-D68 or Enterovirus 68.

But Dr. Suzanne Humphries has another name for it — polio.

Humphries, a currently practicing medical doctor and author, says that EV-D68 as well as a host of other viruses and paralytic diseases, “would have been called polio in the 1950s and before.”

And why they’re not today is one of the most sinister vaccine secrets of all. One that health officials will never, ever admit to.

It’s been about 60 years since mainstream medicine and government scientists changed the definition of polio — all to make the vaccine appear more effective.

Before the vaccine came out, Dr. Humphries says, health-care workers were “vigilantly programmed” to always be on the lookout for polio. But after the polio vaccine trials were underway in the 1950s, what health care workers started looking for changed dramatically.

When someone exhibited symptoms of polio, the goal was to note who was vaccinated and who wasn’t. If you were vaccinated, doctors no longer would diagnose you with polio — because acknowledging you had polio would expose the shortcomings and limitations of the vaccine.

Instead of admitting patients had polio, doctors would stubbornly diagnose them with a mysterious non-polio virus — the exact same diagnosis many children are being given today.

That’s how we “eradicated” polio in America — by changing the definition of the disease to include only the viruses the vaccine was effective against.

“The face of polio may have changed,” writes Dr. Humphries in her book Dissolving Illusions, “but it was mostly due to the power of the pen…”

And there are plenty of conditions other than EV-D68 that would have previously been called polio. Transverse Myelitis, is one. It’s an inflammation of the spinal cord that can affect babies as young as five months old.

And it hasn’t exactly been eradicated. There are around 1,400 new cases of it each year that can cause permanent paralysis and can force children onto ventilators (the modern-day equivalent of the iron lung).

Dr. Humphries may be the latest to speak out against the great polio lie, but she wasn’t the first.

In 1962, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, the widely respected head of the biostatistics department at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified before Congress that polio statistics were being muddled to “inappropriately” establish how effective the vaccine really was.

Dr. Greenberg said that by simply changing the “diagnostic criteria,” the cases of those paralyzed by polio were bound to drop, “whether or not any vaccine was used.”

The CDC claims it is still investigating the current EV-D68 outbreak, and that there are “a lot of different reasons” kids can become suddenly paralyzed.

But admitting the real reason is polio…that looks like something it will never do.

As Dr. Humphries says in her book, “By now it should be obvious that there was more to the ‘polio’ story than a crippling virus and a world that was saved by a vaccine.”


More on Vaccines

From the desk of Mercola:

Story at-a-glance


GMO and Food, Should you be eating it?

From the desk of Mercola:

Story at-a-glance

  • The GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is the legal basis used to allow biotechnology companies to get away with fraud
  • To qualify for GRAS, there must be overwhelming consensus present within the scientific establishment, and that consensus cannot be based on hypotheses or speculation; it has to be based on solid evidence
  • In the case of GE foods, there is no such evidence. FDA’s own files contain the admission that they didn’t have any evidence upon which to base the presumption that GE foods are GRAS
  • On January 24, a statement signed by 300 scientists was published in a peer-reviewed journal, asserting that there is no scientific consensus on the safety of GMOs
  • For the whole story go HERE
  • GMO and Drugs

Videos of Fireworks, Salinas, Ecuador


Marie and Kims Wedding Day

Marie and Kim on Wedding

Marie and Kim on Wedding

On 12/13/14 I had the opportunity to do my second wedding ceremony for Marie and Kim in Salinas, Ecuador.  They own the Sin Bar where the festivities were held after the wedding.  It was a great time for all and as a guess I’d say more than 200 people were present. Marie and Kim untitled (7 of 38) untitled (8 of 38) untitled (9 of 38) untitled (10 of 38) untitled (11 of 38) untitled (12 of 38) untitled (13 of 38) untitled (14 of 38) untitled (15 of 38) untitled (16 of 38) untitled (17 of 38) untitled (18 of 38) untitled (19 of 38) untitled (20 of 38) untitled (21 of 38) untitled (22 of 38) untitled (23 of 38) untitled (24 of 38) untitled (25 of 38) untitled (26 of 38) untitled (27 of 38) untitled (28 of 38)   untitled (31 of 38) untitled (32 of 38) untitled (33 of 38) untitled (34 of 38) untitled (35 of 38)  untitled (37 of 38)       untitled (15 of 38) untitled (16 of 38) untitled (17 of 38) untitled (18 of 38) untitled (19 of 38) untitled (20 of 38) untitled (21 of 38) untitled (22 of 38)       untitled (29 of 38) untitled (30 of 38)  untitled (32 of 38)   untitled (35 of 38) untitled (36 of 38)  untitled (38 of 38) untitled (1 of 38) untitled (2 of 38) untitled (3 of 38) untitled (4 of 38) untitled (5 of 38)


Wade being a comic

My Son being a comic while playing Texas Holdum.





More on fluoride: From the desk of Dr. Mercola
Story at-a-glance
The Ministry of Health in Israel lifted the mandatory requirement for water fluoridation that was put in place in 1970; there is now a nationwide ban on water fluoridation in Israel
Adding fluoride to water is a medical treatment, and a forced one at that because this substance is difficult to remove from your water
Fluoride was recently added to a list of 11 known industrial chemicals that harm brain development in human fetuses and infants
Despite fluoride’s known developmental risks, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued new recommendations for the use of fluoridated toothpaste in infants and children
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the so-called “safe” level of fluoride in drinking water at the ridiculously high level of 4 ppm (mg/L) in 1986. We are still living with this standard even though the National Research Council recommended it be lowered in 2006
The EPA is expected to complete its review of this standard in 2016, meanwhile it is clear that American children are being over-exposed to fluorideFluoride Toothpaste